• The trusted Australian LMS. Build your own learning. Only pay for active users!
STORE

|

LOGIN

Contact Sales

DEMO

Feature List >

Assessors and Assessment

Features that support graded assessments, manual assessor workflows, and evidence-based competency verification.

Graded Assessment Module

Last updated 06/07/2026

How it works

A formal graded online assessment module can be enabled within any standard topic via the topic’s navigation settings. Once enabled, creators designate individual Quiz, Fill-In, and Match elements as assessment questions. When a learner reaches the assessment module, they are presented with a randomised selection of questions drawn from the full question pool. Creators configure the pass mark (minimum number of correct answers), the maximum number of allowed retakes, time limits (supporting timed assessments) and whether results are shown immediately or held for manual assessor review before being revealed. If a learner exhausts all retakes, they can request additional attempts from their assessors.

Benefit

Provides a structured, auditable end-of-topic assessment that learners must pass before completing the training. Randomised question selection reduces the risk of answer sharing. The retake management workflow ensures that learners who struggle are not simply blocked without recourse, while keeping admins informed and in control of exceptions. Particularly important for compliance topics where proof of knowledge is required.

FAQs

Yes. A graded assessment module can be enabled within any standard topic — learners are presented with a randomised selection of questions drawn from the full question pool and must meet a configured pass mark before the topic is marked complete.
That depends on how the assessment is configured. Creators set a maximum number of allowed retakes — if a learner exhausts all attempts they can request additional attempts from their assessor, which triggers a notification to the assessor and admins with a direct link to the learner’s progress.
It reduces that risk significantly. Questions are drawn randomly from the full pool each attempt — learners are unlikely to receive identical question sets, and the order of answers within each question can also vary.
Yes. Manual review mode holds results until an assessor approves them — useful for organisations where a human needs to verify outcomes before learners are informed, or where assessment integrity needs an additional layer of oversight.

Manual Assessment Elements

Last updated 06/07/2026

How it works

Five content elements support manual assessor review: Q&A (written responses), Task (practical activity completion), Upload (file submission), Event (attendance at an instructor-led session), and Requirements (structured evidence or document submission). For each element, creators configure whether submission is compulsory, whether assessor grading is required, and whether the learner can progress through the topic or complete it before their submission is graded. Elements not yet graded appear as Pending. Once all pending items are passed, the learner’s enrolment is automatically set to complete without requiring the learner to log back in.

Benefit

Enables blended and practical assessment workflows that go beyond automated quiz marking. Organisations can assess real-world competency — a task completed on the job, a document uploaded as evidence, attendance at a workshop, or a written response demonstrating understanding. The progression control settings allow organisations to decide whether learners must wait for a pass before proceeding, supporting both formal and informal assessment designs.

FAQs

Yes. Five elements support manual assessor review — Q&A for written responses, Task for practical activity completion, Upload for file submissions, Event for instructor-led session attendance, and Requirements for structured evidence such as licences or credentials.
It depends on configuration. Each assessable element can independently be set to allow progression and completion before grading, or to require a pass before the learner can proceed — giving organisations control over whether assessment is a gate or a parallel process.
No. Once all pending items are passed the learner’s enrolment is automatically set to complete — no action required from the learner or admin.
Yes. Bulk grading is available across all assessable element types — useful for scenarios like marking event attendance for an entire cohort after a workshop.

Assessor Role and Assignment

Last updated 06/07/2026

How it works

Assessors are a distinct user role in Tribal Habits, separate from creators, admins, and learners. A person can be an assessor of one or more topics without having any admin access. Assessors are assigned per topic via the topic’s Access tab or via the user’s profile. A person cannot be both a creator and an assessor of the same topic — however, creators automatically have the ability to assess submissions in topics they create. Assessors can be grouped using the Groups feature so that each assessor only sees submissions from learners in their assigned group. Assessors access pending work via the Assess tab on their learner homepage.

Benefit

Allows organisations to distribute assessment responsibilities to subject matter experts, supervisors, or line managers without granting them broader admin access. A workplace trainer can be assigned as assessor for a practical skills topic, a manager for a conduct-related upload, or a specialist for a compliance evidence review — each seeing only the submissions relevant to them. The Groups integration means large organisations can scope assessors to their own division or location.

FAQs

No. Assessors are a distinct user role — they can be assigned to one or more topics and access pending submissions without any admin permissions. A workplace trainer, line manager, or subject matter expert can be an assessor without seeing or touching anything else in the platform.
Yes. Assessors are assigned per topic via the topic’s Access tab or via the user’s profile — each topic can have its own set of assessors entirely independent of other topics.
No. A person cannot hold both roles on the same topic. However, creators automatically have the ability to assess submissions in topics they create — so the restriction only applies to explicitly assigned assessor roles.
Yes. When the Groups feature is enabled, assessors can be restricted to seeing submissions only from learners in their assigned group — a regional assessor sees only their region’s submissions without access to other areas.

Assessor Grading Interface

Last updated 06/07/2026

How it works

Assessors access all pending submissions via the Assess menu within the topic creator view, which has separate tabs for each assessable element type (Q&A, Task, Upload, Event, Requirements). Submissions are grouped as Pending or Complete. For each submission, the assessor selects a Pass or Fail result — selection is instant with no save button required. Optionally, the assessor can add a numeric score, written comments, and attach a file. Attached files can be shown to the learner (e.g. annotated feedback) or hidden (e.g. internal notes). Learners are not automatically notified of grades for Q&A, Task, and Upload — assessors can trigger a manual notification to the learner for any individual submission. For Event attendance, learners are automatically notified. Bulk grading is available, allowing assessors to grade multiple submissions at once.

Benefit

Designed for speed and simplicity — assessors can work through a queue of submissions rapidly without navigating between screens or clicking save repeatedly. The ability to attach files and leave comments supports meaningful, evidence-based feedback rather than a simple pass/fail tick. The hidden file option enables assessors to maintain internal notes alongside the formal grading record without exposing those notes to learners.

FAQs

Assessors access all pending submissions via the Assess menu within the topic view — separate tabs for each assessable element type show submissions grouped as Pending or Complete. Grading is instant with no save button required.
It depends on the element type. Event attendance notifications are automatic. For Q&A, Task, and Upload submissions, learners are not automatically notified — assessors trigger a manual notification to the learner for individual submissions where needed.
Yes. Bulk grading is available across all element types — assessors can select multiple submissions and apply a result in one action, significantly reducing time spent on high-volume grading tasks.

Assessor Log (Assess Learners View)

Last updated 06/07/2026

How it works

Within the Assess section of a topic, assessors and creators can switch to the Assess Learners view, which provides a per-learner summary of all their assessable submissions across all element types in that topic. Each learner entry shows their overall topic progress status, a count of pending and graded contributions per element type, and a full submission history. Clicking into a learner reveals all their individual submissions — Q&A answers, uploaded files, task completions, event attendance records, and requirement submissions — with their grades, scores, and any assessor comments, all in one place. The learner list can be filtered by group, enrolment type, element type, and other criteria.

Benefit

Provides a complete, consolidated view of a learner’s assessment journey within a topic — essential for VOC (verification of competency) workflows where an assessor needs to confirm that all required evidence has been collected and assessed before signing off on competency. Replaces the need to cross-reference multiple reports or systems. Particularly valuable in industries with formal competency assessment requirements.

FAQs

Yes. The Assess Learners view provides a per-learner summary of all assessable submissions across all element types in that topic — including grades, scores, and assessor comments — without needing to cross-reference multiple reports or screens.
Yes. It is specifically suited to VOC (verification of competency) workflows where an assessor needs to confirm all required evidence has been collected and assessed before signing off on competency — everything needed is visible in one consolidated view.

Observation Element – Assessor Workflow

Last updated 17/07/2026

How it works

Assessors grade Observations from the Assess Learners page, opening a dedicated, mobile-friendly review page per observation. Assessors work through each checklist item, applying a grading label, an optional score, a comment, and optional file/photo/video evidence per item. Once all items are graded (and the learner has accepted, if required), the assessor finalises an overall result, comment, score, and evidence, and chooses whether to notify the learner. If a learner doesn’t pass, the assessor can issue a retake in one of three modes: full retake (all items reset to pending), partial retake (only failed items reset, passed items retained), or retake previous attempt (clones the prior attempt for adjustment). Every attempt is retained and viewable in full. Assessors working without internet access can download a blank PDF version of the checklist, complete it on paper, and enter results later, or upload a scan as an attachment. Every action taken is logged in a per-observation audit trail (actor, decision, timestamp, attempt), downloadable as a CSV.

Benefit

Extends Tribal Habits’ existing manual assessment capability to structured, item-by-item competency verification – the standard format required for verification-of-competency (VOC) style assessment in trades, healthcare, manufacturing and similar sectors. Partial retakes mean learners only need to redemonstrate what they failed, rather than repeating an entire assessment, while the full attempt history and audit log support compliance and audit requirements. Offline PDF support suits assessors working in the field, on-site, or anywhere without reliable connectivity.

Table of Contents